The Solution to Homelessness Isn't Complicated, It Just Isn't Profitable

New York City spends $3.96 billion annually on homeless services, enough to build 22,000 permanent housing units every year. We're lighting money on fire while people freeze.

America has 274,000 people sleeping outside tonight, with 771,000 total experiencing homelessness. Cities hemorrhage billions on emergency responses that solve nothing. Meanwhile, Vienna houses 60% of its residents in beautiful public housing. Singapore houses 80%. The solution isn't mysterious; it's politically inconvenient for developers who profit from scarcity.

---

One F-35 fighter jet costs $110 million, enough for 1,964 affordable homes. The program's $2 trillion lifetime cost equals 40 years of national housing tax credits. A single Patriot missile at $7 million could build 125 homes. We have the money.

Cities can solve housing through massive public construction starting tomorrow. Using modular building, eliminated zoning restrictions, and municipal bonds, thousands of units can be under construction within six months, completed within two years. The obstacle isn't technical; it's politicians more interested in protecting profit margins than human life.

The proof that this works exists at scale. Red Vienna from 1919 to 1934 built 64,000 units housing 200,000 people, one in eight residents, funded entirely through luxury taxes. No borrowing. Karl-Marx-Hof's 1,382 apartments included kindergartens, clinics, libraries, gardens. Not warehouses but "Versailles for the working class." This wasn't a pilot program. It was systematic transformation at metropolitan scale.

Singapore moved from 9% public housing at independence to 80% today through direct government construction. They built over 1 million units and achieved 90% homeownership through subsidized purchases of public units. The key difference from the U.S. is they never stopped building. Their population of 5.6 million is smaller than NYC. If they can house 80%, we can house our homeless 0.1%.

Before Reagan, we knew how to do this in America. Penn South Manhattan, built in 1962, has 2,820 affordable apartments, still affordable because residents refuse privatization. St. Francis Square in San Francisco has 299 racially integrated units, originally offered at $84-140 monthly in 1964. We didn't forget how to build public housing; we chose to stop.

Housing isn't a normal commodity. You can't manufacture more downtown land when demand rises. Urban land functions as monopoly; higher prices trigger speculation, not supply. When large builders control 48-80% of new construction, varying by market, they restrict supply exactly as monopoly economics predicts.

Private developers avoid affordable housing because, as their own Harvard studies confirm, it "does not generate sufficient profit to warrant investment." Full stop. The Low-Income Housing Tax Credit, our primary tool, proves the point: 80% flows to for-profit developers while NYC's One57 luxury tower extracted $65.6 million in public subsidies to provide 66 affordable units. That's $994,000 per unit in corporate welfare.

The federal government already spends $30.3 billion annually on housing vouchers that chase rising rents in a rigged market. That money could build 540,000 permanent units at Richmond's construction costs. Every year. Forever.

Reagan didn't reform public housing; he destroyed it. HUD's budget was slashed from billions to a fraction, with exact figures varying by inflation calculation. Annual households assisted crashed dramatically. In 1970, America had 300,000 more affordable units than households needing them. By 1985, we had a 3.3 million deficit.

Homelessness exploded from temporary hardship to permanent feature. The Faircloth Amendment then banned new public housing construction entirely, capping units at 1999 levels while population grew 61 million. During this demolition, Reagan maintained massive mortgage interest deductions, with the vast majority flowing to wealthy homeowners. He called homeless people "homeless by choice" while subsidizing wealthy homeowners at multiples of public housing spending. This wasn't incompetence. It was the ideology of greed.

Implementation can start tomorrow. Minneapolis eliminated single-family zoning in 2019. The result was a 12% housing increase in five years, with rent rising just 1% versus 14% statewide. The city council vote took one evening. Houston builds 14 times faster than San Jose because it has no zoning. California's SB 35 created automatic approval for compliant projects. Every city can do this next month.

Modular housing cuts construction time 30-50%, reduces costs 20%, and achieves 67% better energy efficiency. Minneapolis deployed 84 units across 16 sites in 14 months. Canada allocated $500 million for modular construction with workforce training. Factories already exist. Contracts can be signed tomorrow. First units can be delivered in 90 days.

Cities own vast underutilized land in parking lots, defunct facilities, and excess right-of-ways. No acquisition needed. No negotiations. Just build. Every city has already mapped these parcels. They're sitting in GIS databases right now.

Municipal bonds access $4 trillion in capital markets at historically low rates. Vienna funds its entire system through land value capture: buy land, upzone, capture increase. Montgomery County's revolving fund continuously reinvests returns. The money exists; cities issue bonds for stadiums all the time.

The mythology against public housing collapses under scrutiny. "The projects failed" is wrong; deliberate underfunding and concentrated poverty policies failed. Vienna's social housing serves teachers, nurses, office workers alongside lower-income residents. No stigma exists because everyone lives there. Singapore houses 80% of citizens across all income levels. When public housing is for everyone, everyone supports it.

Government can also maintain property when it chooses to. Vienna invests €500 million annually in maintenance and upgrades. American public housing has $70-80 billion in deferred maintenance because Congress chose to defund it, not because government can't paint walls. The military maintains 5,000 bases worldwide. We can maintain domestic apartment buildings.

The economics are clear. Denver saves $15,733 annually per housed person in reduced emergency services. Every $1 in permanent supportive housing returns $1.80 in reduced public costs. Homelessness is expensive. Housing is cheaper.

The logical chain is unbreakable. When housing becomes commodity, profit requirements exclude unprofitable humans. When government abandons provision, markets fail predictably. When speculation exceeds wages, homelessness becomes structural. When we spend billions on Band-Aids, the wound never heals.

The solution follows inevitably. Remove profit requirement through public provision. Build at scale to shape entire markets. Finance progressively so public investment returns public benefit. Serve everyone to build unshakeable political support. Every successful example, from Vienna to Singapore to early American public housing, followed this formula. Every failure abandoned it.

The path forward is clear. In month one, hold an emergency city council session. Eliminate parking requirements, authorize accessory units, upzone transit corridors, inventory public land. One night of votes. In month two, issue municipal bonds, execute modular construction contracts, begin site preparation. The construction industry is desperate for contracts. By month six, have the first 1,000 units under construction with temporary housing in place. Visible progress changes political dynamics. By year one, cities can complete 5,000 units with homelessness visibly declining. Program expansion becomes politically unstoppable. By year two, have 15,000 units operational with rents stabilizing citywide. Other cities will copy the model.

We put 12 men on the moon in 8 years. We can house our people in 2.

Every night 274,000 Americans sleep outside while we spend $7 million on a single missile. This isn't a policy failure; it's a moral atrocity we've normalized. Cities spend billions on hotel vouchers and police sweeps while people die in tents. Families pay 50% of income for shelter while developers extract $65.6 million subsidies for luxury towers. An entire generation is priced out of stability while we debate whether housing is a "right."

Vienna proves government can guarantee quality housing for all. Singapore proves it works at scale. Finland proves you can reverse decades of failure with a 68% reduction in long-term homelessness through simple policy: build people homes.

The solution requires no innovation, no study, no pilot program. Just the political courage to say: profit has no place in human necessity. Build massive, beautiful, permanent public housing and build it now.

If you enjoyed this article, you might also like:

CONSERVATISM: AMERICA'S EMPATHY DISORDER
My latest book
Get it on Amazon →

Works Cited

American Journal of Preventive Medicine. "Systematic Review: Housing First Programs Cost-Effectiveness." 2025.

Breaking Defense. "F-35 Program's Lifetime Price Tag Tops $2 Trillion." April 2024.

Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. "An Agenda for the Future of Public Housing." 2024.

Diamond, Rebecca and Tim McQuade. "Who Wants Affordable Housing in their Backyard?" Stanford Graduate School of Business, 2019.

Federation of Protestant Welfare Agencies. "FY 2025 NYC Budget Analysis." FPWA, 2024.

Government of Canada. "Budget 2024: Chapter 1 - More Affordable Homes." 2024.

Harvard Graduate School of Design. "The Architecture of Red Vienna, 1919-1934."

Housing Development Board Singapore. "Public Housing – A Singapore Icon." HDB.gov.sg, 2024.

Minneapolis Public Housing Authority. "84-unit Family Housing Project Milestone." 2024.

National Coalition for the Homeless. "What is the Faircloth Amendment?" 2024.

National Home Builders Association. "Concentration of Large Builders in Metropolitan Markets." Eye on Housing, 2022.

National Low Income Housing Coalition. "HUD Releases 2024 Annual Homeless Assessment Report." NLIHC, 2024.

National Low Income Housing Coalition. "Public Housing Capital Needs." 2024.

New York City Council. "Department of Homeless Services FY2025 Budget Report." NYC Council Budget Division, March 2024.

Pathfinders. "Housing First Policy: Finland." SDG16.plus, 2024.

Pew Charitable Trusts. "Minneapolis Land Use Reforms Offer a Blueprint for Housing Affordability." January 2024.

Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association. "US Municipal Bonds Statistics." SIFMA, 2024.

SF Weekly. "The Great Eliminator: How Ronald Reagan Made Homelessness Permanent." Archives.

Shelterforce. "Ronald Reagan's Legacy: Homelessness in America." May 2004.

U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. "2024 Annual Homeless Assessment Report." HUD Exchange, December 2024.

U.S. Government Accountability Office. "F-35 Sustainment: Costs Continue to Rise." GAO-24-106703, April 2024.

Urban Institute. "Assessing the Impact of Affordable Housing on Nearby Property Values in Alexandria, Virginia." 2022.

Urban Institute. "Proposed Cuts to Public Housing Threaten Repeat of 1980s Housing Crisis." 2018.

Vienna City Government. "Social Housing in Vienna." wien.gv.at, 2024.

Wikipedia. "Penn South." Accessed September 2025.