The Existentialist Republic

The Existentialist Republic

Nov. 17, 2025 · Soft Secession

The Confederacy Was Right: America Has Always Been Two Nations

And forcing them together has given white supremacists the tools to destroy democracy from within

National Guard troops at the Lincoln Memorial, Washington DC, 26 August 2025. Photograph: Allison Bailey/NurPhoto/Shutterstock

Federal agents in masks are conducting sweeps through cities across the nation, arresting people without warrants based on the color of their skin, the language they speak, or if they say something that hurts the agent’s feelings. The Supreme Court just overturned lower court rulings that said this violated the Fourth Amendment. ICE detention facilities in Texas face armed attacks as the administration ramps up deportation operations despite local opposition. Blue state governors watch federal power deployed against their residents while their own authority gets stripped by a Court that spent decades being captured by the same people who started this fight in 1860.

This isn’t new. This is the same war.

The Confederacy recognized something the Union refused to admit: they were fundamentally incompatible nations that could not coexist under one government. They were monstrous about why, but they weren’t wrong about the fact.

I spent years inside the white supremacist power structures of American law enforcement and corrections. I know how deeply this ideology is embedded in every institution meant to protect us. And I can tell you with absolute certainty that the conflict we’re living through right now isn’t a temporary political crisis. It’s the continuation of a war that never ended because we never addressed what caused it. We kept two incompatible visions of America in the same government, and now the vision built on white supremacy has partisan control over all three branches of the federal government.

The founders thought they could kick the can of resolving the slavery debate and it would eventually resolve itself. It didn’t. It got worse. The nation was born schizophrenic, with two completely opposed value systems forced to share the same government. One side believed in expanding human rights and progress. The other believed in christian extremism and white supremacy as organizing principles for society. These cannot coexist. They never could.

When Southern states drafted their own constitution in 1861, they made only one significant change from the U.S. Constitution: they explicitly stated that white people were the superior race and that slavery was the cornerstone of their civilization. This wasn’t some fringe position. These provisions passed with overwhelming support across Confederate states. Lincoln and Congressional Republicans offered them everything. The Corwin Amendment, passed by Congress and supported by Lincoln himself, would have made slavery permanent and impossible to abolish through constitutional amendment. Lincoln sent this proposed amendment to every governor.. He said in his first inaugural address that he had “no objection” to making slavery protection “express and irrevocable.”

They rejected his offer.

Lincoln offered to pay slaveholders to free their slaves. They said no. He offered constitutional protection for slavery where it already existed. Not good enough. They recognized what Lincoln wouldn’t admit: this wasn’t about finding the right compromise. It was about two nations with completely opposite values being forced to share a government. They didn’t want to negotiate. They wanted to leave. And you know what? They were right to recognize the incompatibility. They were catastrophically, monstrously wrong about white supremacy being good or justified. But they correctly identified that you cannot run a nation when half of it is built on the principle of racial hierarchy and the other half claims to believe in equality.

So what did Lincoln do with this recognition? He preserved the Union because he believed secession would lead to anarchy and the death of democratic government. His reasoning was mostly legalistic: states couldn’t just leave whenever they lost an election. The precedent would destroy any possibility of stable government. But he never seriously grappled with the alternative question: what if forcing people who reject democracy to stay in the democratic system actually destroys democracy more thoroughly than letting them go?

Look, this isn’t about relitigating the choices of a man who literally has his face carved into a mountain. This is about honestly reviewing where we are today and how we got here. We could have built the democracy we claimed to want without being constantly sabotaged by people who never believed in it.

Instead, we fought a war to force them back in. And we won the war but lost everything that came after.

Reconstruction lasted barely a decade before it was effectively counteracted. The federal government abandoned freed slaves to the very people who had enslaved them. Jim Crow wasn’t some separate social problem. It was the South winning the peace after losing the war. Every single progressive achievement in American history has been clawed back by the same regions for the same reasons. The New Deal got gutted. Civil Rights legislation got undermined through voter suppression and mass incarceration. Every time we make progress toward the multiracial, free and fair democracy we claim to want, the descendants of the Confederacy use every tool available to reverse it.

This isn’t cyclical politics. This is one continuous conflict. The fault line has never moved. The states that fought to preserve slavery are the states that fight against voting rights today. The ideology that demanded white supremacy as the foundation of society is the ideology that demands the same now. The cold civil war never ended. It just got colder for a while. Now it’s heating back up.

And here’s what people miss about the current moment: Texas isn’t trying to do things differently in Texas. They’re using federal power to impose their vision everywhere. The Supreme Court just overturned lower court rulings protecting California residents from detainment based on skin color, the language they speak, and any other explicitly racial or religious indicator. Racial profiling is now legal, the term being used by legal scholars is a “Kavanaugh Stop.” SCOTUS is systematically striking down blue state attempts to regulate their own affairs. Federal agents are conducting military-style raids in our homes, businesses, schools, and churches.

They never stopped waging their war, and we have never held them accountable. They control the Supreme Court. They’ve gerrymandered enough state legislatures to block constitutional amendments. They’ve rigged enough election systems to maintain minority rule. And they’re using all of that captured power to impose their will on states that voted against it. You cannot “agree to disagree” with people who are trying to criminalize your existence. You cannot compromise with a movement that sees democracy itself as the enemy.

Look at what they’ve accomplished. Six Supreme Court justices appointed by presidents who lost the popular vote now control constitutional interpretation for a generation. They’ve gutted voting rights. They’ve legalized corruption. They’ve granted the president immunity from prosecution, but only if you understand that SCOTUS has made it perfectly clear the difference between a prosecutable act and an immune one is whether it was done by a Democrat or a Republican.

The structure Lincoln preserved has given them the tools to win. The Senate they control overrepresents their states. The Electoral College gives them the presidency even when they lose the popular vote. The Supreme Court they’ve captured interprets everything in their favor. The federal law enforcement apparatus I once served in is overwhelmingly sympathetic to their ideology. This isn’t some passing phenomenon. This isn’t going away when Trump dies. The movement he leads is the continuation of the Confederate project: white supremacist, christian extremist, committed to power at all costs.

Here’s the hard truth: preserving the Union didn’t preserve democracy. It gave white supremacists 160 years to capture the mechanisms of government and use them against the very people Lincoln was ostensibly protecting. You cannot run a democracy with a large faction committed to destroying democracy. We have 160 years of evidence proving this. Reconstruction failed. Jim Crow happened. The New Deal got rolled back. Civil Rights gains eroded. And now they control enough of the federal government to impose their vision on everyone.

Every compromise has failed. Every attempt at national unity has failed. Every appeal to shared values has failed because we don’t share values. We never did. On occasion we had shared enemies and mistook that for national unity. One part of America believes in freedom and justice, in separation of church and state, in protecting vulnerable people, in using the government to promote general welfare. The other part believes in racial hierarchy, in christian nationalism, in using state power to punish the different, in democracy only when it produces their preferred outcome. These cannot coexist. The Confederacy knew this in 1860. We need to accept it now.

The solution isn’t abandoning America. It’s defending ourselves from a death cult and building the nation we can believe in. Real democracies that are interested in actual governance and progress. We just have to accept that we can’t build it while being actively assaulted by people whose entire identity is opposition to those values. If you live in those states, we can make grants to help Louisiana refugees fleeing the People’s Republic of MAGA.

The Confederacy told us who they were. We should have believed them. Better late than never. For more on the specific tools blue states can use to actually start winning, see The Existentialist Republic Introduction to Soft Secession.

https://theexistentialistrepublic.myshopify.com/products/intro-to-soft-secession



References

ABC News. (2025, September 9). Supreme Court lifts restrictions on Trump immigration tactics in California. https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/supreme-court-lifts-restrictions-trump-immigration-tactics-california/story?id=125368918

CalMatters. (2025, September 8). Supreme Court allows immigration agents to resume indiscriminate sweeps in LA, siding with Trump. https://calmatters.org/justice/2025/09/la-immigration-sweeps-supreme-court/

Corwin Amendment. (2025, August 18). In Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corwin_Amendment

NBC News. (2025, February 3). Here are the cities where ICE raids are taking place: Miami, Los Angeles, Atlanta, New York City, Phoenix and more. https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/are-cities-ice-raids-are-taking-place-rcna189390

Originally published on Substack →
Subscribe by email →